Review Petition  

Days after the Supreme Court gave its historic verdict on the Ayodhya land dispute case, Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind has filed a review petition and has obtained a stay order on the construction of Ram Temple in the area.

In November, a five-judge Supreme Court bench unanimously said the entire disputed land spread over 2.7 acres would be handed over to a trust formed by the government, which will monitor the construction of a Ram temple at the site

While on one hand the All India Muslim Personal Law Board held a meeting and decided to file a review petition against the Supreme Court's verdict on awarding the disputed land to Ramjanmabhoomi Nyas, on the other hand, Shia Waqf Board chief Wasim Rizvi donated Rs 51,000 to Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas.
 

Despite widespread messages that Ayodhya verdict was balanced, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board has decided to file review petition, said they will not accept the 5-acre land.

In its verdict today, the Supreme Court gave its stamp of approval on the Rafale deal, but more importantly said that the perception of individuals cannot be the basis of a fishing and roving enquiry by the Court

The Supreme Court has dismissed the review petitions challenging its verdict in the Rafale case that was passed on December 14, 2018. The verdict was pronounced by CJI Ranjan Gogoi, Justice SK Kaul and Justice KM Joseph. 

As Supreme Court today will pronounce its judgment on the review petitions challenging Sabarimala verdict of September 28, 2018, related to the entry of women into the Ayyappa Temple in Kerala, we look at the series of events

The judgment on the Sabarimala review petition will be pronounced by a Bench of Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and Justices Rohinton Nariman, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court will announce its verdict on the entry of women in the Sabarimala temple. The top court will also review its judgment into the alleged irregularities in the Rafale jet procurement case. That apart, the apex court will decide upon the case against Rahul Gandhi for his “Chowkidar chor hai’ comment. 
 

 The judgment on the Sabarimala review petition will be pronounced by a Bench of Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and Justices Rohinton Nariman, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra
 

Will the Congress and the JD(S) file a review petition before the top court in relation to the verdict on seventeen disqualified MLAs? 

The Supreme Court on Saturday directed the Centre to give five acres of suitable land to Sunni Waqf Board and at the same time make necessary arrangements for the construction of the temple by forming a trust.
 

The Supreme Court allows the review petition filed by the Centre against Court’s judgement of ‘diluting’ various stringent provisions of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The Centre had filed a review petition after the SC judgment led to violent nation-wide protests by various SC/ST organisations on April 2, 2018.

Gandhi said that he had made the statement based on the SC’s acceptance of the review petition in the case of the Rafale jet deal in its order passed on April 10 'without having seen or read the order'.

While Bhushan appealed to the apex court to hear the matter soon, Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi said the review petition hearing needed the constitution of the same bench that had heard the matter then