Cauvery Regularity Board Meeting under chairman Navin Kumar concluded with the order that Karnataka must release water to Tamil Nadu proportionately for the next five days.
New Delhi: Cauvery Regularity Board Meeting under chairman Navin Kumar ended with the board ordering the release of water to Tamil Nadu proportionately for the next five days.
The board has also announced scheduled the next meeting for August 8, in New Delhi. A bill seeking to expedite and streamline resolution of inter-state water disputes was approved by the Lok Sabha on Wednesday.
A key feature of the inter-state river water disputes (amendment) bill, 2019 is the constitution of a single tribunal with different benches, and the setting up of strict timelines for adjudication.
Also watch: Cauvery water row: MP Sumalatha Ambareesh counters DMK's Dayanidhi Maran in Lok Sabha
At present, there are nine tribunals including those on Cauvery, Mahadayi, Ravi and Beas, Vansadhara and Krishna rivers. The lower House approved the bill, which seeks to amend the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956, by a voice vote.
Piloting the bill, Union Jal Shakti Minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat said the existing tribunals constituted for resolution of river water disputes among states have failed to resolve the issues and a change in approach was needed.
The minister said there have been instances when a tribunal could not resolve a dispute between states for 33 years.
While underlining the need for strict and timely implementation of the awards of tribunal, the minister observed, “We have to focus on management of water as neither court nor tribunal can create water.”
On concerns expressed by members regarding reliability of data, the minister said the government will make all data on water public with a view to make everything transparent.
The debate also witnessed acrimony and heated exchange of words between some members from Tamil Nadu and Karnataka over the Cauvery water dispute.
The acrimony prompted Speaker Om Birla to intervene. In a bid to calm down the members, he observed: “This is not assembly of Karnataka or Tamil Nadu.”
During the debate, Opposition parties like the Congress and Trinamool Congress alleged that the proposed legislation has no provision for consultation with states and was an assault on the federal structure.
In his reply, Shekhawat said the bill aims to address long standing water disputes permanently and urged all parties to back it.
He said all states were consulted way back in 2013 and then the draft bill was sent to a standing committee. Its recommendations were taken on board before the bill was finalised, he added.
The earlier bill lapsed when the term of the 16th Lok Sabha ended.
Agreeing with the concerns expressed by many members over the issue of water availability, he said India has 18 per cent of the world’s population but only four per cent replenishable water. The water issue can become a matter of concern like climate change, he said.
Under the proposed law, a retired Supreme Court judge will head the tribunal. There will be benches formed as and when required. The benches though will be wound up once a dispute is resolved.
The tribunal will be mandated to deliver final award in two years and it is proposed that whenever it gives order, the verdict gets notified automatically.
As per the current provisions of the 1956 Act, a tribunal can be formed after a state government approaches the Union government with such a request and the Centre is convinced of the need to form the tribunal.
Opposing the bill, Congress member Manish Tewari said the proposed legislation has no provision for consultation with states which is an “assault on the Constitution”.
Tewari said the bill is “completely and absolutely flawed”, nothing matters pertaining to water are complex and it takes time for resolution of such disputes.
BJP member Satyapal Singh said there should be no apprehension in anyone’s mind that the central government wants to hurt the federal structure of the country and asserted that the bill is the need of the hour.
The provision for making domain expert as members is a significant decision in the right direction, he said
Read Exclusive COVID-19 Coronavirus News updates, at MyNation.